一 | New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.
The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.
"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.
While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."
The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.
The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.
The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.
Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.
The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.
The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.
A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.
The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.
The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.
UNI SM ING。 很多消费者有这样的经历，网购出了问题想退货，翻遍App都找不到人工客服入口；对着AI客服发送“转人工”，它却只会循环回复“我理解您的心情”。9月1日起，我国首个聚焦人工客服与智能客服协同机制的国家标准《顾客联络服务 人工与智能客户服务协同要求》将落地实施。（据央视新闻8月22日报道）凭借全天候响应、低成本运维的优势，AI客服已全面融入电商、出行、通信等各类生活服务场景，既帮助企业降本增效，也为消费者带来了便捷高效的基础服务体验。然而，一些短板也随之凸显。今年上半年，售后服务问题占全国消协组织受理投诉的26.79%，其中AI客服应用场景随意扩大、虚假承诺和人工接入困难问题尤为突出，给消费者造成很大困扰。这些问题的背后，是企业过度压缩服务成本的短视行为。有的刻意让AI客服跟用户兜圈子，消耗用户的精力和耐心；有的在AI客服作出虚假承诺后，以“算法生成”为由推卸责任。本应作为沟通桥梁的AI客服，反而成了阻碍沟通的围墙，损害消费者合法权益，也透支企业信誉。这些问题之所以产生，很重要的一个原因就是缺乏相关的统一规范。此次新国标精准填补了行业规范空白，明确规定当用户需人工介入时，要能顺利找到人工客服：入口要清晰，不能层层隐藏；分工要科学，简单的问题交给AI，复杂的纠纷及时交给人工；做好人机的切换，达到条件系统要自动流转到人工。新国标落地后，将成为相关部门监管的重要参照，为行业划定了服务底线，引导企业平衡降本与服务质量，推动客服体系转向人机合理分工、协同运作。AI客服无法完全替代有温度、有思考的人工服务。复杂的消费纠纷、棘手的维权诉求，终究需要人工客服介入妥善解决。新国标让“一键转人工”从消费者的美好期盼，变成企业必须恪守的硬性服务底线。
二 | 这并非束缚技术创新，而是以制度规范纠正行业乱象，让人机协同真正服务于消费者，为交易顺畅、行业发展营造更好的环境。（王 艺）。
Current article:http://tyjx.piepengxikuozhuangzebaohouye.sbs/s9l/20260826/9543.html
Published on:00:00:00
